Open
Conversation
Contributor
|
@l337r007, this kind of modification requires a major release, as it may break the compatibility with systems that are using C-SPARQL and Jena 2.x. I suggest to put the code in a branch for now, so that @mbalduini and the other C-SPARQL developers can make some tests. Can it work? |
Author
|
@dellaglio, I already figured this wouldn't land anytime soon. I'll leave my fork (with respective |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We want to integrate CSPARQL in a project that runs on Apache Jena 3.0.1.
Combining both Jena versions doesn't really seem to work, but lifting CSPARQL-engine to a more recent Jena appears to work just fine, with minimal effort.
Would you consider updating the requirement for an upcoming release?
Is there a way to test whether the change has significantly broken anything?